Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

Nauka i technika

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

Komentarze

  • LeEpicPlayz Bacon
    LeEpicPlayz Bacon3 godzin temu

    Me: shows off my laggy big thicc redstone rocket in random Minecraft creative worlds What I see 5:43

  • Elias Ohm
    Elias Ohm22 godzin temu

    So finally that attack is rebugged for enslavement of attackers pilots and defense missiles to aoid future outfalls...

  • LoparceGaming826
    LoparceGaming82622 godzin temu

    1:11 sn9 moment 1:31 sn8 moment

  • PrimeIX
    PrimeIXDzień temu

    gg

  • Виталий Лукашин
    Виталий ЛукашинDzień temu

    👍👽

  • emmm
    emmmDzień temu

    It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!

  • Heybar Sequera
    Heybar SequeraDzień temu

    Amazing job!

  • stringsnare
    stringsnare2 dni temu

    Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    Dzień temu

    Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.

  • HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?
    HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?3 dni temu

    11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot

  • andre troll
    andre troll4 dni temu

    MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser

  • Frank Tuckwell
    Frank Tuckwell4 dni temu

    Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍

  • Glitched Blox
    Glitched Blox4 dni temu

    11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.

  • bcvbb hyui
    bcvbb hyui4 dni temu

    Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.

  • moises gonzales
    moises gonzales4 dni temu

    Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!

  • Caio Portella
    Caio Portella4 dni temu

    Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?

  • onemaxlight
    onemaxlight4 dni temu

    amazing..

  • ICOD73
    ICOD735 dni temu

    For a moment, it looked CGI.

  • Alex Hendrix

    Alex Hendrix

    3 dni temu

    I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.

  • bcvbb hyui

    bcvbb hyui

    4 dni temu

    Nice

  • Ailsa Ni
    Ailsa Ni5 dni temu

    The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

  • Igor Delta F.
    Igor Delta F.5 dni temu

    Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

  • Matt's Youtube stuff

    Matt's Youtube stuff

    18 godzin temu

    @Igor Delta F. I'm not sure where you get 1400 days from. During the closest approach, Mars is about a 6-9 month journey depending on which year you launch. That is maximum ~270 days trip one way to Mars. Perhaps you can be more specific on where you are getting your numbers from

  • Igor Delta F.

    Igor Delta F.

    19 godzin temu

    @Matt's PLtoolss stuff Yes they are unrelated. But my point was not to relate them, instead I used cybertruck merely to give an example. The degree of complexity of starship is just far beyond from what we have achieved in terms of technology right now. The longest time a human was continuously in space is 437 days, and the record is 665 cumulative days. A crewed mission would require 1410 days trip plus several days of orbital alignment, docking , collecting data, weather conditions IF everything goes 100% perfect. We are not talking about a single individual +1500 days but a CREW of maybe 4 to 8 people! Unfortunately there are several other factors that we need at least a decade to develop. Don't take me wrong, I want to see so hard humans going mars, but not as a suicidal mission. On my perspective no earlier than 2040 for a crewed mission. But for a cargo ship maybe in this decade. Fingers crossed 🙏

  • Matt's Youtube stuff

    Matt's Youtube stuff

    20 godzin temu

    You can't compare the two, at all. For a long time, there just wasn't a facility available to build Cybertruck. The major hurdle or requirement to go to Mars is having a safe and reliable system, and launching at the correct window which opens every two years. In 2022, SpaceX will (fingers crossed) be able to send unmanned cargo vehicles to Mars, which if successful will pave the way to send humans in either 2024 or 2026. If they are unsuccessful in 2022, it will push the timeline back another 2 years. The one thing I agree with you on is yes this is marketing. They want people to be excited about this and they want to make it their goal to send people to Mars regularly. TLDR; The point is the comparison you make to the Cybertruck is completely unrelated to the development of Starship.

  • 69

    69

    4 dni temu

    @Igor Delta F. Where do you get your information about the cybertruck starting in 2012?

  • Igor Delta F.

    Igor Delta F.

    4 dni temu

    @69 the idea of a cybertruck started in 2012. The first prototype was in 2018. The first cybertruck to public will be in the end of 2021. Starship is so far to meet the requirements, without mentioning the human limitations in other fields to make this reality. 2040 is a optimistic year, and I hope I am wrong because I want to be alive when man go there.

  • little Phoenix33
    little Phoenix335 dni temu

    So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀

  • vbddfy euuyt
    vbddfy euuyt6 dni temu

    happen live 😂

  • David X

    David X

    4 dni temu

    @Ailsa Ni what

  • Ailsa Ni

    Ailsa Ni

    5 dni temu

    Демократия не долетит до Марса.

  • Wayne Davis
    Wayne Davis6 dni temu

    did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?

  • Olavo Neves
    Olavo Neves6 dni temu

    hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz

  • SadSmileTV
    SadSmileTV6 dni temu

    congratulations

  • JP muro
    JP muro6 dni temu

    What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    Dzień temu

    @JP muro I have shown you multiple videos captured by amateurs, yet you still insist on cgi? What's your proof of CGI?

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    Dzień temu

    @JP muro twitter.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1377001018102276097 (That was SN11 the twitter pic, the links are SN10) pltoolss.info/one/wideo/32eJqci1j3iZerM pltoolss.info/one/wideo/0WWmebmZuYGEf7c

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    Dzień temu

    @JP muro Well sure since that was filmed before the launch, lemme find you an amateur video of it. Theres also RGV Aerial Photography, and after the bellyflop Fail of SN11 they photgraphed it's nosecone laying on the ground im gonna get you some links.

  • JP muro

    JP muro

    Dzień temu

    The real question lies beyond you and me and what we both think. Theres proof , that this is all a hoax. The question is why are you defending something that you can't prove, while all claims against what your trying to cling to have tons of facts , scientific, to back them up. My proof is right there , the cgi sequence at the end and the so called landing, i know its hard. We both have our own truths and i respect that, its just that's this is soo in our faces , its impossible not to see. And question its nature

  • JP muro

    JP muro

    Dzień temu

    We'll , yes , i see it. It never took off. Did it? i mean i could go there tomorrow and take a pic, what's your proof? Where's the footage of take off and descent.

  • JP muro
    JP muro6 dni temu

    Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk

  • David X

    David X

    4 dni temu

    Go to boca chica

  • vbddfy euuyt

    vbddfy euuyt

    6 dni temu

    looks like a sci fi film

  • Björn der Sachse
    Björn der Sachse7 dni temu

    Alles nur lüge

  • Volksgenosse Erich Honecker

    Volksgenosse Erich Honecker

    6 dni temu

    Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    6 dni temu

    Go there yourself and see it for yourself

  • Andy Harrison
    Andy Harrison7 dni temu

    This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?

  • shark2v
    shark2v7 dni temu

    nice cgi

  • David X

    David X

    4 dni temu

    Go to boca chica

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    7 dni temu

    You can go there yourself and see it

  • John McGrath
    John McGrath8 dni temu

    Is this even real? It looks like cgi

  • Juan Pablo Muro

    Juan Pablo Muro

    Dzień temu

    yeah, its because it is

  • KELOO JBL ッ

    KELOO JBL ッ

    6 dni temu

    @alexn310 ye

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    7 dni temu

    Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.

  • Lexi Talks
    Lexi Talks8 dni temu

    Nice

  • แก่ง นาง
    แก่ง นาง8 dni temu

    ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป

  • แก่ง นาง
    แก่ง นาง8 dni temu

    NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้

  • Dave Timothy
    Dave Timothy8 dni temu

    12:00 I see starhopper

  • KELOO JBL ッ

    KELOO JBL ッ

    6 dni temu

    ye love starhopper

  • Saanichton Ministries
    Saanichton Ministries8 dni temu

    What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.

  • Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    7 dni temu

    @Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell

  • Saanichton Ministries

    Saanichton Ministries

    7 dni temu

    @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?

  • Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    7 dni temu

    @Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....

  • Saanichton Ministries

    Saanichton Ministries

    7 dni temu

    @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?

  • Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    7 dni temu

    @Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t

  • Денис Петин
    Денис Петин8 dni temu

    Демократия не долетит до Марса.

  • Pascal Fokx
    Pascal Fokx8 dni temu

    bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing

  • KELOO JBL ッ

    KELOO JBL ッ

    6 dni temu

    ouais

  • NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON
    NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON9 dni temu

    FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • vince mm
    vince mm9 dni temu

    looks like a sci fi film

  • KELOO JBL ッ

    KELOO JBL ッ

    6 dni temu

    ye but is real

  • Carmen A. Cabello
    Carmen A. Cabello9 dni temu

    That is bull shit.

  • It’s grant

    It’s grant

    6 dni temu

    @Shorty haha

  • Shorty

    Shorty

    7 dni temu

    Carmen is close to karen

  • It’s grant

    It’s grant

    8 dni temu

    @alexn310 thanks for saving me time

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    8 dni temu

    Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on PLtoolss

  • Nebula Dust
    Nebula Dust9 dni temu

    24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )

  • collilab laboratorio visivo
    collilab laboratorio visivo9 dni temu

    Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...

  • Константин Голубятников
    Константин Голубятников9 dni temu

    Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..

  • Jephro321
    Jephro3219 dni temu

    I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.

  • Matt's Youtube stuff

    Matt's Youtube stuff

    20 godzin temu

    They didn't cut anything out. The livestream ended shortly after landing. The explosion happened approx 7/8 minutes later

  • K4!T3N

    K4!T3N

    4 dni temu

    Did you even seen the live stream?

  • 69

    69

    4 dni temu

    This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    8 dni temu

    @Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.

  • Jephro321

    Jephro321

    8 dni temu

    @alexn310 no what it blew up period.

  • gilbondfac
    gilbondfac10 dni temu

    launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous

  • KK FF
    KK FF10 dni temu

    When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration

  • Epic gamer Heap1

    Epic gamer Heap1

    3 dni temu

    @TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case

  • TimePro

    TimePro

    3 dni temu

    @Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.

  • Epic gamer Heap1

    Epic gamer Heap1

    3 dni temu

    @TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.

  • TimePro

    TimePro

    5 dni temu

    @Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.

  • Epic gamer Heap1

    Epic gamer Heap1

    5 dni temu

    It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks

  • Dolores Izabella
    Dolores Izabella10 dni temu

    Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.

  • Huỳnh Đức Lê
    Huỳnh Đức Lê10 dni temu

    Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄

  • It’s grant

    It’s grant

    8 dni temu

    @Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    8 dni temu

    @Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.

  • Huỳnh Đức Lê

    Huỳnh Đức Lê

    8 dni temu

    @alexn310 I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.

  • alexn310

    alexn310

    8 dni temu

    Starship is too heavy for a parachute.

  • nice guy
    nice guy10 dni temu

    what do you make of this: Take a look at the spaceX logo. (the actual logo). When I look at the logo SpaceX... I'm seeing: Spy.... then it says..... Cc .....(which in numerology is 33. Freemasons number). .... Then what looks like a symbol that appear to be something trying to 'break out of the dome". So that's one interpretation. Or another: Spa cex. Or in other words "Spa Sex". then the X in that looks like it could represent the act of sex (look carefully, it's crazy.) (boom-chic-a-waa-waa). Okay and a 3rd interpretation goes like this: SpaceX. Well "X" in english and internationally is a way of saying "No". So it's Space-NO. or in reverse: No Space. Which is pretty obvious these days. So those are 3 interpretations of the SpaceX LOGO.

  • It’s grant

    It’s grant

    3 dni temu

    @nice guy I have no patience for people with special needs

  • nice guy

    nice guy

    3 dni temu

    @69 no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

  • nice guy

    nice guy

    3 dni temu

    @It’s grant no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

  • nice guy

    nice guy

    3 dni temu

    @K4!T3N The rockets are a scam. The cars are turning out to be a scam. Everyone who's used PayPal for any length of time knows it's a complete scam. What has he turned out yet that's actually a quality product that's not a lie or a scam??? The car is one thing, because it's just a really really shitty car. But the rockets are total frauds. It's not space exploration. It's a fireworks company. People are so dumb they don't understand anything.

  • K4!T3N

    K4!T3N

    4 dni temu

    You milking it??.... bruuuuuuhhhh

  • Biljana Milinčić-Bežanović
    Biljana Milinčić-Bežanović10 dni temu

    I think that the engineers made a mistake in constructing the "SN" rocket in that they practically limited the cooling of the "Raptor" engine. When the descent starts and the engines start, they start or do not work. Then air pressure is created which returns the heat to the "pot", so to speak. With Falcon rockets, the engines are free and they don't have that problem. One of the solutions is to drill holes in the lower part, next to the legs, or to line the engines with refractory material.

  • hordes Coffee
    hordes Coffee11 dni temu

    Did anybody see the paper clip to the right of screen

  • It’s grant

    It’s grant

    8 dni temu

    ?????????? please show when?????????? U OK DUDE????????????

  • Die Katze
    Die Katze11 dni temu

    Well done folks . Keep it up .

  • derms ter
    derms ter11 dni temu

    cgi did not improve much i guess..

  • derms ter

    derms ter

    4 dni temu

    @K4!T3N you speak like you came from there lol

  • K4!T3N

    K4!T3N

    4 dni temu

    @derms ter Go to boca chica, texas.... you're just lazy... lol

  • Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    7 dni temu

    @derms ter Theirs no need...... theirs hundreds of videos of the landing .......

  • derms ter

    derms ter

    7 dni temu

    @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez you film the landing for me, i will believe

  • Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    8 dni temu

    @derms ter Go to boca chica in the next 2-3 weeks for SN15..........Lets see if its CGI at that point :)

  • bouytt guyt
    bouytt guyt11 dni temu

    team.

  • FinZdrav
    FinZdrav11 dni temu

    Оооо ес 🤑

  • nothing is impossible
    nothing is impossible11 dni temu

    Cool

  • Aistis Aukstikalnis

    Aistis Aukstikalnis

    10 dni temu

    pltoolss.info/one/wideo/voazhrWX13uGpKs

  • Ca Sneaks
    Ca Sneaks11 dni temu

    The mature pan practically observe because custard adventitiously refuse apud a unadvised captain. handy, dull black

  • Jared Johanne Agustin
    Jared Johanne Agustin11 dni temu

    Eh 3 years left before the starship goes to Mars

  • bouytt guyt

    bouytt guyt

    11 dni temu

    Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se s

  • Ron Guada
    Ron Guada11 dni temu

    That.... was incredible!

  • NOOBSTORE
    NOOBSTORE11 dni temu

    soooooo perfect

  • dLedger XYZ
    dLedger XYZ11 dni temu

    Release the onboard camera during descent so that we can see space at that altitude. Oh nevermind, it's still the decades long grammar why not

  • Brent Smith

    Brent Smith

    5 dni temu

    This flight went to 10km. If you want to 'see space at that altitude', whatever that means, you'd be better served by booking a flight on an airliner, as they can get up to 13km.

  • Boris Wrongston
    Boris Wrongston11 dni temu

    more tax payers money down the Shitter

  • Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez

    8 dni temu

    Your probably more dependent on the government tax payers than SpaceX is.........Their a private space company :)

  • Ethan Roberts

    Ethan Roberts

    11 dni temu

    It's a private company, no tax payers money

  • ceerw buty
    ceerw buty12 dni temu

    The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

  • Charalampos Avgenikos
    Charalampos Avgenikos12 dni temu

    You are coming from the SN11 flight test yesterday. 😂

  • ForgeSkyGaming

    ForgeSkyGaming

    11 dni temu

    Yes 😭😭

  • Максим Поскин
    Максим Поскин12 dni temu

    Это что то фантастическое

  • Peter Zhu
    Peter Zhu12 dni temu

    The typical profit quantitatively scold because height formally mix notwithstanding a steadfast room. squeamish, incandescent net

  • Daniel Perez
    Daniel Perez12 dni temu

    the geniuses just keep showing off.. very impressive

  • ceerw buty

    ceerw buty

    12 dni temu

    Give it a few more minutes

  • HYTECH REALATORS
    HYTECH REALATORS12 dni temu

    Congratulations 🎉👍

  • one click
    one click12 dni temu

    The brash destruction joly add because tuna tellingly complain notwithstanding a helpful smile. quizzical, bright nation

  • Mayo Garland
    Mayo Garland12 dni temu

    The dramatic club relevantly kiss because otter broadly scorch per a selfish aluminium. square, impolite temple

  • Manuel Martin
    Manuel Martin12 dni temu

    pero tambien da la impresión que fue un lanzamiento controlado preparando algo a si como para un futuro aterrizaje esa son mis tres impresiones no se elucubro

  • Manuel Martin
    Manuel Martin12 dni temu

    Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se si existe tecnología para enfocar a tan larga distancia esta toma me hace recordar un programa de Tv de cuando era niño .( Thunderbirds Los Guardianes del Espacio ) que por cierto todo lo que allí emitían hoy día es una realidad ........................suspicacia

  • Андрій Володимирович
    Андрій Володимирович12 dni temu

    Рогозин обосрался...

  • Jay Paint
    Jay Paint12 dni temu

    Who’s here after SN11 blew up mid-flip maneuver

  • KidSpaceFans

    KidSpaceFans

    4 dni temu

    @Jay Paint That's better!

  • Jay Paint

    Jay Paint

    4 dni temu

    @KidSpaceFans Yeah that sounds a bit pessimistic. Let me fix that.

  • Pol Valls

    Pol Valls

    11 dni temu

    mid-landing flip you mean

  • KidSpaceFans

    KidSpaceFans

    12 dni temu

    It didn't blow up mid-flight...

  • ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ
    ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ12 dni temu

    Elon: NUCLEAR MISSILE COMIN' YOUR WAY!... Just kidding...

  • Pol Valls

    Pol Valls

    11 dni temu

    a missile coming belly first?

  • Ian Morton
    Ian Morton12 dni temu

    ...SpaceXtastic...!!!

  • asterisKs
    asterisKs12 dni temu

    Shouldn't have launched sn11 in the fog, it was gonna blow up anyway even if the FTS didn't work. Welp sn15 here we come

  • TimePro

    TimePro

    8 dni temu

    Wether there was fog or not it doesn’t change anything.

  • Darth Revan

    Darth Revan

    9 dni temu

    That's what I said! And everyone went mental at me for calling SpaceX foolish as fuck for doing so. Completely rushed and wasted.

  • Don
    Don12 dni temu

    great achievement, the landing is awesome, but somehow i don't like those type of spaceships. I believe one day we will go into one piece of fully controlled spaceship :)

  • Don

    Don

    17 godzin temu

    @Matt's PLtoolss stuff rather 500-1000y ;)

  • Matt's Youtube stuff

    Matt's Youtube stuff

    18 godzin temu

    @Don Yes it's very interesting indeed. Perhaps we will see such technological advancements 50-100 years from now.

  • Don

    Don

    19 godzin temu

    @Matt's PLtoolss stuff to travel to new stars also requires very high medical knowledge, Hybernation. if it will turn out no teleporation is possible (again quantum entanglement story) That quantum ental..... is imo one of the most important thing in whole science. Why it exists, what is that for? to carry mental state from dead body ? living after death in different dimention? We can't see any real connection of paired subparticules on distance, but maybe this is the effect of some processes from highe dimension. As scientist can't detect any even smallest fluctuation of anything during the process ,when changing state of 1st particular automatically change state of the other in time of ZERO at whatever distance. If I remember the latest test was performed at the distance of around 60kms or more. Although near death experience (NDE) happens only in our heads.... we cannot just say for 100% that it's due to processes in brain (very likely) but if we hear that those people could be in all places they want at the same time, that they even could tell what their family members (away) were doing while they were "out" of their bodies as they claim. Of course assuming that at least a few stories were real not just faked for any reason...as people can do a lot for money. ....selling stories etc. The most interesting is the case of neurosurgeon (not religiious one). What the nature uses that feature for. This is the most interesting thing for me in whole science...

  • Matt's Youtube stuff

    Matt's Youtube stuff

    19 godzin temu

    @Don You are right, of course, we don't know the technological advancements that will occur well into the future. The sort of technology that helps engineer an SSTO vehicle will likely be used to travel to new stars.

  • Don

    Don

    20 godzin temu

    @Matt's PLtoolss stuff nowadays impossible. Imagine getting energy from splitting atom ( a lot in atmosphere) on fly and later in space getting it from photons or other stuff, included magainzed energy from new kind of battery. Too early to even imagine how it may be in next 1000years. I bet the aim is not to carry too much fuel with the ship and that might be possible as you can get energy from anything.. what matters is to create proper devices which can do that. Also imagine that something might be hidden.. explain how works quantum entalngement... maybe we will be able to send small portions of energy if a source is millions kms away. If we can affect a state of an sub-atom particular on distance, that means a change. a change means that something happens if something happens you can get energy from that...as there is no action without energy. to change something = energy rises... so why not to connect millions of the particles to set entanglement on on those packets and do something with that on distance ;) In space you only needs energy to change velocity and direction of you vehicle... landing or starting from planets different storry as you have a lot of particules in atmospheres you can use to get that energy

  • Syahrul Ridzuan
    Syahrul Ridzuan12 dni temu

    Yep, I knew it

  • Neil Mcmac
    Neil Mcmac13 dni temu

    High altitude ? ??? It's a rocket , ten kilometers ( six miles ) is not high . Germany was sending rockets that high in 1944 . 76 years and no progress ??? . And this is an empty rocket , load her up with fuel and life support systems and this tin can will never leave the launch pad . MARS has nothing to fear

  • 69

    69

    4 dni temu

    @Neil Mcmac so you're stuck in the past considering you said you lived through the 60s and 70s. You're hated for Elon Musk also seems to be getting in the way of your good judgment if you ever had any. Starship and Saturn v are not comparable. We did not have real reusable rockets in the 40s quit making up shit.

  • Neil Mcmac

    Neil Mcmac

    6 dni temu

    @Pol Valls dollars to doughnuts says Musk picks up and leaves town before any of his make believe rockets ever reach orbit . He is just suckling as many dollars out of the system that he can , or are you one of those morons that really believe Musk is using his own money . Lay off the drugs and try to think ahead a little , you load that tin can up with supplies, life support, crew quarters and extra engines and fuel to orbit and de-orbit and you have a disaster waiting to happen . Nothing but a pipe dream .

  • Pol Valls

    Pol Valls

    6 dni temu

    @Neil Mcmac falcon 9 landed at its 5th try and now it's the most reliable rocket. Starship had 4, and next prototype is full of new technologies successfully proven. Please, don't compare a mission to a test. The expectations are different, Saturn V was pioneering, Starship is so too. And Sn10 landed. SN11 tested advanced solutions, they learn from them and they will do the same, fly fail fix

  • IsaQuest

    IsaQuest

    7 dni temu

    @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez yeah it wasnt a good paragraph but you get the point that im trying to make. again, you said it very well

  • Neil Mcmac

    Neil Mcmac

    7 dni temu

    @IsaQuest because you don't learn anything if the damn thing is not balanced as it would be , or loaded as it would be . Musk is going ass backwards . Proving something that doesn't help him one little bit in the real world . Put weights in to make up for crew, fuel, live support . Now test it , Musk is testing on an empty can , the balance point will not be close to what a real ships balance would be ,,,,, so at the end of the day Musk has learned zero .

  • haug0099
    haug009913 dni temu

    Give it a few more minutes

  • ToXiC_BigFatBaby
    ToXiC_BigFatBaby13 dni temu

    whos here after sn11

  • Latortuga 007
    Latortuga 00713 dni temu

    🚀My rating: Starship SN8: 8/10 Starship SN9: 4/10 Starship SN10: 9/10 Starship SN11: 2/10 Gonna update my rating every time from now on.

  • Matt's Youtube stuff

    Matt's Youtube stuff

    20 godzin temu

    What is your rating based on? Level of excitement or what was achieved? I'm just curious as to how you gave SN11 a 2/10, you couldn't see a damn thing! lol I would argue that SN11 is an unfortunate 0/10 because of the fog, but from an engineering perspective a 10/10 because it helped them identify an issue that they need to fix for future missions.

  • Pol Valls

    Pol Valls

    11 dni temu

    @IsaQuest no.

  • Latortuga 007

    Latortuga 007

    12 dni temu

    @TimePro the leaning was cool too

  • TimePro

    TimePro

    12 dni temu

    SN9 I'd say would be also 9/10. They fixed the header tank issue that was present in SN8s flight.

  • Latortuga 007

    Latortuga 007

    12 dni temu

    @Starship SN10 ur welcome! ☺️

  • Armchair Revolutionary
    Armchair Revolutionary13 dni temu

    Nutso!!lol...beautiful but nuts!!!congratulations to the whole team!!

  • Efloor
    Efloor13 dni temu

    I remember when these looked like grain silos

  • Gerald Wagner
    Gerald Wagner13 dni temu

    The trite market significantly harass because ship lilly glow without a empty history. wrong, depressed maraca

  • Afri Cola
    Afri Cola13 dni temu

    didnt it explode a couple minutes after?

  • Pol Valls

    Pol Valls

    11 dni temu

    this is the test flight video, this is not the video of the entire recovery process

  • Roland B.

    Roland B.

    12 dni temu

    it exploded 8 minutes later. but that's the fault of the landing legs,

  • tomer K
    tomer K13 dni temu

    Who is here after SN11?

  • Pol Valls

    Pol Valls

    11 dni temu

    me

  • 27ratri kongsanti

    27ratri kongsanti

    13 dni temu

    Me

  • Jan Scampi

    Jan Scampi

    13 dni temu

    me

  • KaterinaTalantliva
    KaterinaTalantliva13 dni temu

    The quality is amazing

  • CYBERCEL
    CYBERCEL13 dni temu

    'these datas'

  • Halumash
    Halumash13 dni temu

    COMPLETELY CGI !! Maybe they want to remember others to the old SS20 ....

  • 69

    69

    4 dni temu

    @K4!T3N what?

  • K4!T3N

    K4!T3N

    4 dni temu

    @69 Go to boca chica texas.... You're just lazy

  • 69

    69

    4 dni temu

    @Halumash that argument doesn't even make sense.

  • Halumash

    Halumash

    4 dni temu

    @69 And propably they where the same reasons since that time in 69 , Mister 69 ...

  • Halumash

    Halumash

    4 dni temu

    @69 I already changed my mindset, my dear. Good night!!

  • Emerson Galatti
    Emerson Galatti13 dni temu

    kkkkkkkk a partir dos 10 min. computação gráfica, só se for muuuuito idiota pra acreditar

  • IsaQuest

    IsaQuest

    12 dni temu

    its not cgi. just look at the other people’s footage

  • Emerson Galatti

    Emerson Galatti

    13 dni temu

    esse cinegrafista é bom heim, caiu junto com o foguete, manteve-o nivelado no centro da imagem e só pra mostrar que é bom mesmo deu zoom out aos 11:35, aos 11:41 se vc não riu eu não vou te explicar...aos 12:05 a quicada na nave é a melhor...enfim...é por isso que os maus não disfarçam mais, não é necessário...

  • Rui Sarmento
    Rui Sarmento13 dni temu

    E mesmo que subas tão alto como uma águia e entre as estrelas plantes o teu ninho Eu te derrubarei.

  • Dhruva Shah
    Dhruva Shah13 dni temu

    Even if it blew up, my confidence in SpaceX has never been higher, and it will keep going up.

  • hordes Coffee
    hordes Coffee13 dni temu

    Or even space travel

  • hordes Coffee
    hordes Coffee13 dni temu

    Could it be possible to building an atom smasher in space. And place it vertically? Because, Im assuming that it must be laid down on earth, it could draw objects to it. If some way we could manipulate a simulated gravitational pull. We could then harness it as anti gravity. If its on or around an object. Could that work, is this possible. Or build it separately build some large mass to simulate a gravitational pull like earth's. Just asking a question

  • alexanderx33
    alexanderx3313 dni temu

    Starship on the pad after landing is something straight out of a movie. I mean that's a two lane highway right next to it! Its too big to be real

  • Your Mom
    Your Mom13 dni temu

    but they didn't show it blowing up which it did 6 mins later after landing

  • 69

    69

    4 dni temu

    They stopped the recording before it blew up.

  • VirtualEchobolt
    VirtualEchobolt13 dni temu

    These times remind me of the 60s and mans desire to go beyond what we never thought would never be possible. Really amazing ship and really amazing guy Elon Musk.

  • Ash Williams
    Ash Williams13 dni temu

    Nice animation!

  • David X

    David X

    4 dni temu

    Go to boca chica

  • MOLE

    MOLE

    12 dni temu

    It’s real

  • Bloody Evolution

    Bloody Evolution

    13 dni temu

    Ooo which part?

Kolejny